He said something this morning, that as per usual i have been dwelling on ever since.
"can you honestly say there isnt anything you wouldnt do if I asked you?"
to which my reply was...i dont know, because its hard to know for sure until actually confronted with whatever it might be, so i dont know.
His response was "I think you do"
It was left like that, i wanted to say...well there was that once when i couldnt do what you asked, but i have since done it, so that would have been pointless.
Its been on my mind, should my automatic response been yes? or am i hiding behind the i dont know because i dont want to admit its a yes?
I know he would not ask anything of me that was detrimental in any way, to me, to us, so its got me exploring the whole concept of 'anything'
There are most certainly things that i have no wish to do, reasoning's varying from it simply doesnt appeal to me, to a simple i dont want to at all, and i will not like you very much if you make do them.
But the counter-argument to that is
1) being his slave, there is the understanding that it will involve submitting to things that dont appeal to me, because i do already
2) the same applies to that which i dont want
3) he couldnt care less whether i like him or not so long as i obey, because i do love the grumpy git even when i dislike him
4) i know, as does he that i get off on being made to do things i dont want to do
So, it could be argued that therefore i will do whatever he asks of me, and perhaps im in denial but i still think its subject to what that anything is.
So, i wrote this with the intention of having a clear resolution, but only succeeded in getting back to square one!